Ojibwe bands are evaluating their options and plan to respond with a wolf declaration shortly. For tribes, the best use of wolves comes in the form of live animals, on the land, helping to enhance and maintain healthy ecosystemsGreat Lakes Indian Fish & Wildlife Commission In a press release on August 13, 2013 Ojibwe leaders respond. “The DNR Natural Resources Board made clear that its decision to set the wolf quota at 300 has nothing to do with science or stewardship,” said Michael Isham, Great Lakes Indian Fish & Wildlife Commission executive administrator. “This reckless approach to ma’iingan management is why tribes have filed a brief in support of lawsuits that seek the restoration of federal protection for wolves.” Great Lakes Indian Fish & Wildlife Commission is an intertribal agency comprised of eleven Ojibwe bands in Wisconsin, Upper Michigan, and Minnesota. GLIFWC works with member bands to both manage and preserve off-reservation treaty reserved resources. The Voigt Intertribal Task Force develops policy recommendations for GLIFWC-member tribes in the 1837 and 1842 Ceded Territories. Ma’iingan is the Ojibwe Anishinaabe word for wolf. Please visit www.glifwc.org for more information. Press Release from Great Lakes Indian Fish & Wildlife Commission August 13, 2021 Press Release from Great Lakes Indian Fish & Wildlife Commission August 13, 2021 Ojibwe Treaty rights This reckless approach to ma’iingan management is why tribes have filed a brief in support of lawsuits that seek the restoration of federal protection for wolves.Great Lakes Indian Fish & Wildlife Commission Share this: Share on X (Opens in new window) X Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn Share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr Share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email Share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp Like this:Like Loading… Discover more from The Red Cedar Watershed Ledger Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email. Type your email… Subscribe Post navigation Controversial Wisconsin Natural Resources Board vote on November 2021 wolf hunt Op Ed: NRB Politics Threatens Wolf Recovery
I said all along Wisconsin refuses to manage wolves responsibly so they will always need federal protections. Loading... Reply
This is about a tiny minority of fringe hunters & politicians that hold power and abuse it. The majority of Wisconsinites want wolves on the landscape and are willing to fight for the rights to keep the Gray wolf wild & free. Loading... Reply
Wolves must have federal protection as states have failed miserably at creating a heathy ecosystem. Thank you Loading... Reply
[…] bands began evaluating their options Responded with a wolf declaration. “For tribes, the best use of wolves comes in live animals on the land, […] Loading... Reply